Crime & Safety

Lindsay Clancy didn't show 'break with reality' as jury weighs psychosis defense: Susan Smith prosecutor

Lindsay Clancy's defense team has argued that she was experiencing postpartum psychosis when she killed her three young children in January 2023. However,...

Share this story
Lindsay Clancy didn't show 'break with reality' as jury weighs psychosis defense: Susan Smith prosecutor
Lindsay Clancy showed no 'break from reality,' Susan Smith prosecutor says

Lindsay Clancy's defense team has argued that she was experiencing postpartum psychosis when she killed her three young children in January 2023. However, prosecutors have maintained that she did not prove a "break with reality" as required by her defense.

In a recent interview, Rep. Tommy Pope, who prosecuted Susan Smith in 1994 for drowning her two sons, expressed his doubts about Clancy's defense. Pope said that he does not see a clear break from reality in Clancy's actions, citing her ability to order dinner and dial the phone as evidence of her mental state.

Pope also noted that there was a clear motive in the Smith case, which was driven by her desire to be free from her children and her romantic partner. In contrast, Pope said that it is difficult to understand what Clancy's goal was in killing her children. "What was her end game?" he asked.

A forensic psychiatrist who testified in the trial, Gregory Saathoff, said that financial pressure was among the stressors that Clancy faced. Saathoff suggested that Clancy felt she could no longer do the work she loved or help support her family, leading to a sense of being a burden.

Saathoff confirmed that severe insomnia can lead to psychosis, a point that was also made by the prosecution's psychiatrist. The jury is now deliberating on Clancy's fate, with closing arguments having taken place on Thursday.

Source

NTC Report coverage is based on reporting from the original publisher.

View original reporting →